Re: Replace outdated social models in OWL2 primer

pá 21. 3. 2025 v 15:53 odesílatel Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca> napsal:

> On 2025-03-21 15:12, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>
> > pá 21. 3. 2025 v 14:34 odesílatel Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca
> > <mailto:info@csarven.ca>> napsal:
> >
> >     On 2025-03-21 13:48, Dan Brickley wrote:
>
> >      > So anyone in the world could swing the classification with a
> single
> >      > email, then?
> >
> >     I'd certainly hope not, especially when the commenter may have
> >     misinterpreted the text.
>
> > Thanks for clarifying your perspective. Just to reiterate clearly from
> > the Process document:
> >
> > "If there is any doubt or disagreement as to whether a change
> > functionally affects interpretation, that change does not fall into this
> > class."
>
> If you re-read the quote, you will notice it says *any doubt or
> disagreement as to whether a change functionally affects interpretation*.
>
> > Marco explicitly raised doubt about classifying these changes as
> > editorial. Therefore, regardless of how we individually interpret the
> > specifics,
>
> Marco mentioned "minor typographical correction", but no one made such
> suggestion to begin with. And, as I've explained numerous times now, the
> Process classifies errata with correction classes 1-3. Editorial may be
> 1-2. As far as I know, there was no disagreement *as to whether a change
> functionally affects interpretation*. So:
>
> > the existence of this disagreement itself moves it beyond
> > Class 2.
>
> is incorrect, as per the quote you've (cherry-)picked.
>
> Again: even class 3 change doesn't change the bottom line, and rewriting
> examples of a Primer do not go under classes 1,4,5.
>
> I don't doubt that you may have more to say on this topic but I'll
> refrain from repeating myself and will bow out of this sub-thread with you.
>

Thank you!  It is always interesting to hear your interpretations on class
2 changes, which are great food for thought.

Not cherry picking, just observing that process is incredibly clear here.


>
> -Sarven
> https://csarven.ca/#i
>
>