- From: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 19:45:35 +0100
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Tzviya Siegman <tzviya@w3.org>, "Reid, Wendy" <wendy.reid@rakuten.com>
- Message-ID: <b0045fba-cb26-4c1e-9dac-a49ba4f43999@csarven.ca>
On 2025-03-19 09:50, Ivan Herman wrote: > It depends on the changes. Simple (ie, grammatical, markup, etc) changes > can be done directly by the staff. But a more comprehensive change > (which is certainly the case for the issue discussed in the thread) can > be done by a chartered Working Group only. Hi Ivan, Tzviya, and Wendy, please correct me if I'm wrong: As per current W3C Process's Revising a Recommendation: Editorial Changes ( https://www.w3.org/policies/process/20231103/#revised-rec-editorial ): >If there is no Working Group chartered to maintain a Recommendation, the Team may republish the Recommendation with such changes incorporated, including errata and Team corrections. Errata include correction classes 1-3. I believe the changes discussed in this thread ( https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2025Mar/0045.html ) for https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-primer/ fall under correction class 2 ( https://www.w3.org/policies/process/20231103/#class-2 ): >Changes that do not functionally affect interpretation of the document I also believe that the reasons for these changes - raised with general consensus by multiple community members - are not merely technical but extend to expected professional practice, as outlined in the Positive Work Environment at W3C: Code of Conduct ( https://www.w3.org/policies/code-of-conduct/ ). I suspect the broader W3C and standards community would welcome the changes discussed in this thread, and I'm sure there's a way to make it work within the process. However, if this is not deemed a class 2 change, it would be great to have AB's advice on this. Irrespective of the actual path forward (whether editorial, through a Working Group, or otherwise), it might help the community to set up a workspace where the proposal can take shape (e.g., https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/ and GitHub?). Would you be able to follow up on this in https://github.com/w3c/strategy/ or coordinate with the Team elsewhere? Thanks! -Sarven https://csarven.ca/#i
Attachments
- application/pgp-keys attachment: OpenPGP public key
Received on Thursday, 20 March 2025 18:45:43 UTC