Re: vcard:AddressBook

čt 6. 3. 2025 v 11:16 odesílatel Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca> napsal:

> On 2025-03-06 10:04, Michiel de Jong wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > In the Solid CG we are using `vcard:AddressBook`, but it came to our
> > attention that this class is not defined in https://www.w3.org/TR/vcard-
> > rdf/ <https://www.w3.org/TR/vcard-rdf/>.
> >
> > The document says:
> >  > If you wish to make comments regarding this document, please send
> > them to semantic-web@w3.org <mailto:semantic-web@w3.org>>
> >
> > We have documented/used `vcard:AddressBook` in the following places:
> > * https://pdsinterop.org/conventions/addressbook/ <https://
> > pdsinterop.org/conventions/addressbook/>
> > * https://github.com/SolidOS/contacts-pane/blob/
> > ae1819676bb19a2b0cc7a02b4417c96751ff5297/mintNewAddressBook.js#L60-L75
> > <https://github.com/SolidOS/contacts-pane/blob/
> > ae1819676bb19a2b0cc7a02b4417c96751ff5297/mintNewAddressBook.js#L60-L75>
> > * https://github.com/solid-contrib/data-modules/blob/
> > d732671f5c5a37b9748ce90bf3220e2e36336d8f/contacts/src/rdflib/
> > ContactsModuleRdfLib.ts#L48 <https://github.com/solid-contrib/data-
> > modules/blob/d732671f5c5a37b9748ce90bf3220e2e36336d8f/contacts/src/
> > rdflib/ContactsModuleRdfLib.ts#L48>
> >
> > How can we go about adding `vcard:AddressBook` to the vCard ontology, or
> > what would be the best way forward here?
> >
> >
> > Many thanks,
> > Michiel de Jong
> > Co-chair
> > Solid CG
> >
>
>
>
> Michiel, best to check directly with W3C Team.
>
> You may want to look at Solid CG's Contribution Guidelines:
>
>
> https://github.com/w3c-cg/solid/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md#vocabulary-management
>
> and perhaps more specifically the referenced:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2016/08/namespaces/
>
> That's roughly the most reasonable path considering that the SW IG is
> closed. Other changes (additions or errata) were done in the same way to
> vocabularies that are no longer maintained by a W3C Group or a BG/CG.
>
> So, propose the actual changes somewhere, e.g.,
> https://github.com/solid/vocab or perhaps https://github.com/w3c/ns/
> (although that's not where development on vcard happens), and then
> signal the wider community (as you've done with this mailing list) for
> review.
>
> BTW, AFAIK, the use of missing vcard:AddressBook was initially raised in:
>
> https://github.com/solid/type-indexes/issues/35


If we want to effectively build apps, we need to be able to evolve vocabs
in a more agile way than this.

I was thinking about this very problem yesterday.

My conclusion was to make something, similar to, schema.org for Solid.  As
a baseline it would be a context that contains all of schema.org.  Then add
aliases to all the commonly used terms in Solid.  And allow extension
points.  I think I could fire this up quite quickly.  Would anyone else
have use for such a thing?


>
>
> -Sarven
> https://csarven.ca/#i
>
>