- From: Aidan Hogan <aidhog@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 00:37:53 -0300
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: semantic-web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Hi Dan, On 2024-01-16 12:55, Dan Brickley wrote: > > > On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 at 15:02, Aidan Hogan <aidhog@gmail.com > <mailto:aidhog@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > The following survey aims to better understand the incentives within > our > community with respect to publishing, and how the publications of > researchers in the community are valued around the world. > > It is targetted at those who have published papers in the likes of > ISWC/ESWC and/or that intend to publish there in future. > > It should take no more than 5 minutes: > > https://forms.gle/twhGy2wyKyayQWVXA > <https://forms.gle/twhGy2wyKyayQWVXA> > > Your response would be greatly appreciated! > > > Not to casually request scope creep, but… > > > … it would also be interesting to understand the inventives around those > community members who work with Semantic Web technologies but who don’t > publish through ISWC/ESWC or similar. Does posting on blogs, twitter, > github meet similar or different needs? Is scholarly peer review > intimidating, offputting, or just not needed in some career paths? Agreed it would be interesting! The current survey arises from a very specific context and the need to generate data in order to better answer a very specific question, so the role of blogs, twitter, etc., is a little out of scope. My two cents is that blogs et al. play an important role, and perhaps could play a more important role in future (based on how A.I. in particular is increasingly using non-peer-reviewed arXiv papers to disseminate breaking results). There are some key issues with scholarly peer review that I think are being addressed too slowly, but I think that's another discussion and a different survey. :) Best, Aidan > > > > Best, > Aidan > >
Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2024 03:38:03 UTC