- From: Aidan Hogan <aidhog@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 17:30:14 -0300
- To: "Harshvardhan J. Pandit" <me@harshp.com>, semantic-web@w3.org
- Cc: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>
Hi Harsh, Very interesting! We will explore this further with Dagstuhl for TGDK. Thank you for the *very* useful pointers and context! Best, Aidan On 2023-12-21 12:40, Harshvardhan J. Pandit wrote: > Hi. > Re. HTML submissions/versions of "PDF" articles -- arXiv has already > started work on HTML publishing using LaTeX [1], including tooling and > guidelines [2]. This means existing processes where authors submit LaTeX > sources can be co-opted without extra work for authors to produce HTML > versions (on the publishers side) - including RDFa etc. This can be the > "innovation" for Dagstuhl to experiment with. The research group behind > this is KWARC which is also based in Germany (same as Dagstuhl) - so > there is a good match here. > > [1] HTML as an accessible format for papers > https://info.arxiv.org/about/accessible_HTML.html > [2] LaTeXML: a TeX and LaTeX to XML/HTML/ePub/MathML translator. > https://github.com/brucemiller/LaTeXML > > Regards, > Harsh > > On 20/12/2023 03:33, Aidan Hogan wrote: >> >>> Will the journal accept contributions to Graph Data and Knowledge in >>> documents formats that are human- and machine-readable, where >>> significant units of information (as deemed by its authors) is >>> structured and available as a "graph" (think e.g., HTML+RDFa)? >> >> At the moment, we accept only PDFs compiled with LaTeX for the >> official production process, but >> >> * all meta-data associated with publications are published under CC0; >> >> * we are making a push for structured data: we require ORCID ids, DOIs >> for publications and citations, etc.; >> >> * authors hold the copyright of their own works under CC-BY 4.0, so >> there are no limitations on authors publishing, for example, HTML+RDFa >> versions of their papers in their own web space, and if there's a >> critical mass of such papers, we could look into various ways to >> "systematise" this (one such way, already enabled, is to link to >> related versions of the paper from the official publication); >> >> * we are open to explore innovations regarding the publication process >> as best serve the community (of course the final publication details >> are down to Dagstuhl Publishing, but they too are open to innovations). >
Received on Thursday, 4 January 2024 20:30:24 UTC