- From: Thomas Passin <list1@tompassin.net>
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 14:37:04 -0500
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
On 2/10/2023 1:01 PM, David Booth wrote: > On 2/9/23 06:43, Dave Reynolds wrote: >> . . . >> https://www.epimorphics.com/writing-ontologies-with-chatgpt/ > > Nice post! I agree with the potential usefulness (and limitations) that > you observe. But I cannot shake my overriding concern that AI like > ChatGPT will be abused as a spammer's or parasitic website owner's > dream, to flood the web with 1000x more > plausible-sounding-but-misleading-or-wrong crap than it already has, > thus making it even more difficult to find the nuggets of reliable > information. AI is a major force multiplier. As with any other force > multiplier, it can be used for good or bad. > > I personally think we need legislation against AI catfishing, i.e., AI > *pretending* to be human. > > - AI-generated content should be clearly labeled as such. > > - Bots should be clearly labeled as such. Also see (a long read) https://slashdot.org/story/23/02/09/2151255/chatgpt-jailbroken-to-be-more-reckless?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&utm_medium=feed
Received on Friday, 10 February 2023 19:37:19 UTC