- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 07:50:19 -0400
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
On 10/12/22 07:35, Martynas Jusevičius wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 1:23 PM David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote: >> To reap the benefit of this lengthy discussion -- i.e., to prevent >> it from being viewed as merely bike shedding -- I suggest that this >> guidance (to use slash IRIs) be written up as an RDF Community Group >> "Best Practice" document published on the W3C website. That should >> give it sufficient search engine mojo for people to easily find >> it. And -- *after* the up-front-clear-and-simple guidance -- the >> document can also summarize the rationale for that guidance, and also >> summarize reasons why hash IRIs might occasionally be used instead. > > What effect will such Best Practice have on the thousands of > vocabularies already out there in the wild? None, I presume, because "cool URIs don't change". David Booth
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2022 11:50:36 UTC