- From: Hugh Glaser <hugh@glasers.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 15:26:04 +0000
- To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Cc: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, "William.Van.Woensel@dal.ca" <William.Van.Woensel@Dal.Ca>
> On 15 Feb 2022, at 15:05, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote: > > On 2/15/22 07:02, Melvin Carvalho wrote: >>> Am 15.02.2022 um 02:57 schrieb Nathan Rixham <nathan@webr3.org>: > . . . > >> I'd argue that having plain old JSON with some tiny spec > >> which allows the complexity to be punted in to shared > >> documents would be beneficial . . . . >> Here is one from 2011, though it could probably be updated for 2022 >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Mar/0565.html > > Nice proposal! I hadn't noticed it before. I like the line of thinking a lot. I think it merits serious consideration. > > David Booth > Ah good, me too (I feel better not being aware of it if David isn’t :-) And I also thought, hmmm, that looks interesting. And yes, William.Van.Woensel@Dal.Ca, point taken about JS libraries..
Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2022 15:26:51 UTC