- From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@atomgraph.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 19:57:42 +0100
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Cc: hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl, Frederik Byl <frederik.byl@gmail.com>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Melvin, > Very important thing here about "ex:" > > You've actually just made this data into a silo > > With my example "name" in one JSON document is "name" in another JSON document > > That is to say, JSON sent from one machine to another remains stable > > In your example, every different document will have a different namespace, depending on what 'ex:' is defined as, and whether it's absolute or relative. In this case I assume it's relative > > This actually guarantees that the data does NOT interoperate. Whereas if we'd standarized (or can still standardize) the semantic web on JSON with URLs and optionally vocabs, all different aspects interoperate as and when you need them to > With respect, you might know how to build JSON-driven software, but what you described here is an example of how *not* to build RDF-driven software. Of course vocabularies are standardized to communicate shared meaning.
Received on Monday, 14 February 2022 18:58:05 UTC