- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 16:33:17 +0000
- To: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@atomgraph.com>
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 19 December 2022 16:33:41 UTC
On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 at 15:40, Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@atomgraph.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Not sure why this is not all over the @w3.org mailing lists, but it > seems like the future of the W3C is at stake? > > "At this point it looks like we will not have an operational W3C > nonprofit on Jan 1. Every Director will vote their conscience, but it > seems likely that the asset transfer will be rejected, leaving MIT > responsible for its contracts with W3C Members (for which they have > paid)." > https://twitter.com/robinberjon/status/1603835007323209729 > > What consequences does this have for the existing and future > specifications? With respect, I think this is a moment for considering the specific situation of the W3C Team at MIT - the staff whose employment is under threat from this mess. The specs will broadly be ok, and don’t need healthcare or a plan for paying rent/mortgage/heating in the coming weeks. Dan > > Martynas > atomgraph.com > >
Received on Monday, 19 December 2022 16:33:41 UTC