- From: <hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 20:26:50 +0200
- To: <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <002801d8b8b0$3e9e3460$bbda9d20$@quicknet.nl>
Hi, I am trying to reify predicates in a different way, and I need to know whether this is valid RDF. Assume I define an rdf:Property: ont:hasPart rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:domain rdl:Artefact ; rdfs:range rdl:Artefact . ont:valveHasActuator rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:subPropertyOf ont:hasPart ; rdfs:domain rdl:Valve ; rdfs:range rdl:ValveActuator . Then I have project information that tells that individual valve actuator 84128 is a part of individual valve 34543, effective that dateTime. ex:76329 rdf:type ont:valveHasActuator ; rdfs:domain ex:34543 ; # myValve rdfs:range ex:84128 ; # myValveActuator meta:effectiveDate "2022-08-24T10:42:00Z"^^xsd:dateTime . Is this semantically and syntactically correct RDF? (it passed the syntactic test). I hope to hear from you! (sorry Guus, I need the answer asap)
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2022 18:27:06 UTC