RE: [EXT] Re: Upper ontologies

In fact, that was the topic of the first Ontology Summit we held in 2006 (Ontolog Forum, NIST, etc.):
https://ontologforum.org/index.php/UpperOntologySummit


Here's the Joint Communique:
https://philpapers.org/archive/OBRTU.pdf.


Obrst, Leo; Patrick Cassidy; Steve Ray; Barry Smith; Dagobert Soergel; Matthew West; Peter Yim. 2006. The 2006 Upper Ontology Summit Joint Communiqué. Journal of Applied Ontology. Volume 1: 2, pp. 203 - 211, 2006. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Mikael Pesonen <mikael.pesonen@lingsoft.fi> 
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 8:00 AM
To: semantic-web@w3.org
Subject: [EXT] Re: Upper ontologies


Lots of interesting points mentionedand probably the main case against one UO being different point of views.

As a thought experiment, wonder if that would be any problem to combine those existing 17 UOs into one. So how big an issue is that really in practical needs and applications?

Received on Wednesday, 13 January 2021 14:18:29 UTC