- From: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 14:28:17 +0200
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
On 01/04/2021 13.49, Antoine Zimmermann wrote:
> Of course it does not work if you use the PDF!
> You should use the HTML version at:
>
> https://www.emse.fr/~zimmermann/KG/
First: great that there is an HTML version of the canonical version
floating around. Should be relatively straight-forward to throw in some
RDFa to your scripts (even if source is *tex or whatever)?
Second:
curl -i
https://www.emse.fr/~zimmermann/RDF2RDF/do/?uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.emse.fr%2F~zimmermann%2FKG%2F
and
curl -iH'Accept: text/turtle'
https://www.emse.fr/~zimmermann/RDF2RDF/do/?uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.emse.fr%2F~zimmermann%2FKG%2F
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
<pre><code class="language-turtle">
@prefix graph:
<https://www.emse.fr/~zimmermann/Ontologies/rdfgraph/> .
[] a graph:RDFGraph .
</code></pre>
But that's alright! (I'm aware of the day)
The article states:
>Herein we adopt an inclusive definition, where we view a knowledge
graph as a graph of data intended to accumulate and convey knowledge of
the real world, whose nodes represent entities of interest and whose
edges represent relations between these entities.
>Publishing refers to making the knowledge graph [..] accessible [..]
over the Web. Knowledge graphs published as open data are then called
open knowledge graphs.
The article doesn't appear to qualify as a "knowledge graph".
..
Are those two statements for example significant enough to have their
own URIs? How can they be "discovered"? ;)
-Sarven
https://csarven.ca/#i
Received on Thursday, 1 April 2021 12:28:33 UTC