- From: Franconi Enrico <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 10:17:15 +0000
- To: thomas lörtsch <tl@rat.io>
- CC: "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 13 May 2020 10:17:31 UTC
thomas lörtsch <tl@rat.io<mailto:tl@rat.io>>: A quick question from the sideline: can T(s,p,o) be understood as some kind of reification? If we are strict on the RDF terminology: no. Indeed, a reification of the triple p(s,o) would be a resource r such that subject(r,s) object(r,o) predicate(r,p). In a more general sense, reification always involves the existence of a new object (in this case: r) which denotes a complex description (in this case: the triple p(s,o)). So, given a triple described by p(s,o), its reification is a resource r, which denotes that particular triple. As a side note, let me say that reification in RDF is non-normative for a reason: it does not really capture the full semantics of reification, but just its syntactic form. cheers --e.
Received on Wednesday, 13 May 2020 10:17:31 UTC