- From: angin scribe <anginscribe3@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 15:35:26 +0200
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAOgnCB+HXHZ0jM5KFOg_9S7s1Ot39oNMrUg5T-DuTH5NGHk=HQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi everyone, Is the standard semantics of blank nodes in RDF still the same as existentially quantified variables? Let "_:b1" and "_:b2" be blank nodes, In the current standard semantics of RDF, is it still true that the graph below does not necessarily mean that Bob has two different things? Bob has _:b1 Bob has _:b2 I.e., two syntactically different blank nodes do not necessarily mean that they are two different entities. I know that there has been a lot of discussion on blank nodes in the past, cf. [1, 2, 3]. I just want to make sure that there are no recent changes on the semantics of blank nodes that I missed. Please let me know if I miss some recent updates in this area. Many thanks! Cheers, A [1] M. Arenas, M. Consens. A. Mallea. Revisiting Blank Nodes in RDF to Avoid the Semantic Mismatch with SPARQL. https://www.w3.org/2009/12/rdf-ws/papers/ws23 [2] A. Hogan, M. Arenas, A. Mallea, A. Polleres. Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Blank Nodes. Journal of Web Semantics. 2014. [3] A. Mallea, M. Arenas, A. Hogan, A. Polleres. On Blank Nodes. ISWC 2011.
Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2020 08:47:35 UTC