- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:29:36 -0400
- To: semantic-web@w3.org, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
>> On Jul 28, 2020, at 5:53 AM, Henry Story wrote: >> one can not infer from >> >> LauraLane believes { Superman a FlyingBeing } >> >> that >> >> LauraLane believes { ClarkKent a FlyingBeing } >> >> even though the person writing that statement has asserted in the DB that >> >> ClarkKent = Superman In RDF I would be inclined model the parts in curly braces above as separate named graphs, and to give each name a separate URI, so the URI for Superman would be different from the URI for ClarkKent. So far so good. But then Pat wrote: On 7/29/20 12:52 PM, Patrick J Hayes wrote:> Named graphs are not opaque, and should not be given an opaque > semantics, because ‘cool URIs’ should have the same meaning everywhere. > The superman-morning star examples should not arise in a Web context. Could you explain more what you mean? Why wouldn't the superman example arise in a Web context? Thanks, David Booth
Received on Wednesday, 29 July 2020 18:29:50 UTC