- From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 20:52:33 +0200
- To: Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr>, "Shaw, Ryan" <ryanshaw@unc.edu>
- Cc: Hugh Glaser <hugh@glasers.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Ahah, bad choice of examples! Le 27/07/2020 à 18:52, Maxime Lefrançois a écrit : > There already are some datatypes that encode big structures, and are > already standards. > I am thinking about rdf:XMLLiteral, rdf:HTML. From RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax: """5.2 The rdf:HTML Datatype This section is non-normative.""" and: """5.3 The rdf:XMLLiteral Datatype This section is non-normative.""" So, no, they are not standards (being "normative" is synonymous of being "standard", and so, "non-normative" means non standard). Note that rdf:XMLLiteral was normative in RDF 2004, so you're partially right. --Az
Received on Monday, 27 July 2020 18:52:48 UTC