- From: Anthony Moretti <anthony.moretti@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2020 19:22:34 -0700
- To: Jeen Broekstra <jeen@fastmail.com>
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 13 July 2020 02:22:59 UTC
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 6:33 PM Jeen Broekstra <jeen@fastmail.com> wrote: > how does this bit of JSON fit into the conceptual model? How is it stored, > and how is it queried and/or referenced? Is it a single node in the graph? > Then how is it different from just having a literal with a JSON string as > its lexical value? Or if it's a node with several associated properties, > how is it different from just having any collection of statements with a > shared subject (blank node or IRI) that together form the object value? > > It's basically an unpacked literal, to steal Pat's term. It's different from a literal though because (as far as I'm aware) there isn't a standard way to structure the string component of a literal. And it's different from a bnode because you don't need a bnode ID. I haven't used Turtle, but that looks close enough, yes 😂 So if it's already possible to do what I was proposing using Turtle, I guess there's no need to change RDF literals, my bad. Anthony
Received on Monday, 13 July 2020 02:22:59 UTC