- From: Hugh Glaser <hugh@glasers.org>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 12:06:51 +0100
- To: Dieter Fensel <dieter.fensel@sti2.at>, Patrick J Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Excellent! I also smelt a soupçon of "neat" in there. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neats_and_scruffies > On 8 Jul 2020, at 11:54, Dieter Fensel <dieter.fensel@sti2.at> wrote: > > Hi Bad, > > this was not done purposefully. Just my local Bavarian dialects does not provide "p" nor "t". > > Dieder > > On 07.07.2020 05:22, Patrick J Hayes wrote: >> >> >>> On Jul 6, 2020, at 3:44 PM, Dieter Fensel <dieter.fensel@sti2.at> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Hugh, >>> >>> yes I agree and thanks for the pointer which we will check carefully. Actually we could enfore some strong recommendations for future information items in the distributed sources but why should you waste your time when you can hid the issue behind same-as. Full agreement! My point was more: >>> >>> - we started to define a framework for finding "nice" URIs for touristic information coming from heterogeneous sources (events, accommodations, trails, PoI, restaurants, etc.). Close to the end of our exercise we realized that what we are actually doing is just a special case of duplication detection, entity resolution, etc., etc., etc., etc. We even started to wonder whether we really need these "nice" URIs or better just describe entities by their properties and use a strange blank note as an "identifier". The first time after more than 20 years (also through the help of Andreas who was eating my ears on this issue) I started to understand why some nurts are so dedicated about them. >> >> Nurts? Did you mean nurds, or is this a new word? I hope so, because it is a wonderful word, with echoes of nut, nurd, hurt and snort. Congratulations. >>
Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2020 11:07:14 UTC