Re: State of OWL reasoners

On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 11:17, Mikael Pesonen <mikael.pesonen@lingsoft.fi> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> HermiT has a bug giving more false positives that true positives for
> entailment: https://github.com/owlcs/hermit-reasoner/issues/9
>
> Pellet and if i remember correctly openllet give java error when trying
> to compile package: https://github.com/stardog-union/pellet/issues/48


Bit harsh to say they're all broken, or that you don't get answers.

The HermiT issue is misplaced expectations on the OWLAPI parsing, not
a HermiT issue itself.

The problem with Pellet is to do with local builds, not the code.
There are published artifacts that don't require you to build the code
from scratch.

Cheers,
Ignazio

>
> FaCT++: actually just managed to solve issue with missing libs, but
> can't find any documentation on how to make config file for reasoning
>
> eye: missing some dependencies and didn't manage to install right ones
> without documentation.
>
>
> May I ask which one are you running successfully? Btw I'm using Ubuntu.
>
> Br
>
>
> On 25.6.2020 18:39, William Van Woensel wrote:
> > Hi Mikael,
> >
> > Just wondering, what errors are you getting in particular for each reasoner? I've successfully used several of the listed ones. (Also note that EYE is not an OWL reasoner, although it could be used with an OWL2 RL ruleset to fulfill that role to an extent.)
> >
> >
> > W
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mikael Pesonen <mikael.pesonen@lingsoft.fi>
> > Sent: June-25-20 6:59 AM
> > To: semantic-web@w3.org
> > Subject: State of OWL reasoners
> >
> > CAUTION: The Sender of this email is not from within Dalhousie.
> >
> > I thought to do some entailment checking in OWL in way that no programming or install scripting is not be required.
> > So far have tested so far HermiT, Pellet, Openllet, Fact++, EYE and Robot. None of them work.
> > Robot doesn't have the entailment function, others are broken. Either knowledge how to tweak Linux installation scripts to solve conflicts is required or they just crash or function erroneously.
> > Some of the projects are alive, that is, forum and GitHub posts got first answered, but eventually got silence before problems got solved.
> >
> > I thing W3C is doing awesome job making the specifications, but they are useless without the tools that implement them.
> >
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2020 07:57:32 UTC