- From: Christian Chiarcos <christian.chiarcos@web.de>
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 11:45:55 +0100
- To: Mikael Pesonen <mikael.pesonen@lingsoft.fi>
- Cc: SW-forum <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAC1YGdgJEjMWQ2vR4Oc-gXJh1DD0wZUHb5y2vvfoYTXZXmLMng@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, We just extended CoNLL-RDF for PennTreebank-style and XML-based tree annotations in TSV formats (https://github.com/acoli-repo/conll-rdf, see examples/tree-example.sh and examples/xml-example.sh). This is handy if your annotations come in a (any) TSV format (as most NLP tools support). If you look for plain converters for other formats and without much ontological foundation, you can take a look into https://github.com/acoli-repo/LLODifier for various formats, e.g., TIGER, PTB, Xigt, TEI. If you ask for more high-level information extraction pipelines, Aldo mentioned FRED, already, and you might also want to take a look into NIF ( https://persistence.uni-leipzig.org/nlp2rdf/, supports phrases, but no empty elements such as traces) and the LAPPS Grid ( http://vocab.lappsgrid.org/). As a vocabulary for representing phrase structures, I personally prefer POWLA (http://purl.org/powla) for representing the structure of annotations -- because we designed it to be small and generic --, and OLiA ( http://purl.org/olia/) as an ontology for representing the actual annotations. Best, Christian Am Do., 21. Nov. 2019 um 16:52 Uhr schrieb Mikael Pesonen < mikael.pesonen@lingsoft.fi>: > Hi, > > given phrase structure grammars of some text, are there any theories, > work or utilities done for extracting knowledge from them into semantic > (OWL) form? > There are lots of steps involved, for example identifying the entities > and relations between entities. > > Br > >
Received on Friday, 22 November 2019 10:46:10 UTC