- From: <hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl>
- Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2019 13:24:39 +0100
- To: "'Semantic Web'" <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <006f01d596f8$a913f190$fb3bd4b0$@quicknet.nl>
Hi, I would like to hear your opinion about the following. I propose to make a distinction between the terms 'Relationship' an 'Relation' ('Property'), not for linguistic reasons but to avoid reification when that is not necessary. I know that I am on thin ice, so be it. Right now we have something like * Pete isHusbandOf Mary * Mary isWifeOf Pete. But these Relations/Properties actually are Roles in a missing Relationship called Marriage. We can also state: * MarriagePeteMary hasHusband Pete * MarriagePeteMary hasWife Mary where MarriagePeteMary is Relationship and an instance of the owl:Class 'Marriage', or rather its specialization 'Hetero Marriage'. As a consequence we can easily represent information about that Relationship. It appears to me that there are many such Relationships that qualify for being an owl:Class in their own right. Think about Parenthood, Composition, Employment, etc. Please concur or shoot. Regards, Hans 15926.org <http://15926.org/>
Received on Saturday, 9 November 2019 12:24:47 UTC