- From: <hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl>
- Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2019 13:24:39 +0100
- To: "'Semantic Web'" <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <006f01d596f8$a913f190$fb3bd4b0$@quicknet.nl>
Hi,
I would like to hear your opinion about the following.
I propose to make a distinction between the terms 'Relationship' an
'Relation' ('Property'), not for linguistic reasons but to avoid reification
when that is not necessary.
I know that I am on thin ice, so be it.
Right now we have something like
* Pete isHusbandOf Mary
* Mary isWifeOf Pete.
But these Relations/Properties actually are Roles in a missing Relationship
called Marriage.
We can also state:
* MarriagePeteMary hasHusband Pete
* MarriagePeteMary hasWife Mary
where MarriagePeteMary is Relationship and an instance of the owl:Class
'Marriage', or rather its specialization 'Hetero Marriage'.
As a consequence we can easily represent information about that
Relationship.
It appears to me that there are many such Relationships that qualify for
being an owl:Class in their own right.
Think about Parenthood, Composition, Employment, etc.
Please concur or shoot.
Regards,
Hans
15926.org <http://15926.org/>
Received on Saturday, 9 November 2019 12:24:47 UTC