Re: Is scalability the key property of knowlege graph?

I think we've all learned something from the discussion - thanks for
starting it!

xyzscy wrote:
> Thank you for the information. Actually I want to figure out what’s
> the problem that KG is solving. It is a little wired, the theory has
> been very popular, but its value has not be agreed by most of the
> people.And it is very encouraging to know that some people is doing
> the similar research. Maybe that means I’m nearly on the correct way
> to understand KG
>> 在 2019年6月21日，下午7:10，Amirouche Boubekki
>> <amirouche.boubekki@gmail.com <mailto:amirouche.boubekki@gmail.com>>
>> 写道：
>>
>>
>> Le jeu. 13 juin 2019 à 07:40, 我 <1047571207@qq.com
>> <mailto:1047571207@qq.com>> a écrit :
>>
>>     Dear all:
>>
>>     When I first touch knowledge graph, I'm very confused. Different
>>     from the other AI theory, it is not an pattern recognization
>>     algorithm which will give some "output" given some "input"(such
>>     as classify algorithms) ,but a program language(such as owl,rdf)
>>     and database(such as neo4j) instead. 
>>
>>
>> It seems to me wordnet is knowledge graph, conceptnet is knowledge
>> graph same for wikidata. Those are refined data that is related
>> together. I consider basic SPARQL to be a pattern recognizer.
>>
>>     So in my opinion, knowledge graph is more like a problem of
>>     engineering than mathematic theory.
>>
>>
>> Maybe not a mathematic theory, but still much paper has been printed
>> on the subject (semantic network, multinet, framenet), so I would not
>> consider the theory of knowledge graphs settled.
>>
>>     Then I realized that different from the pattern recognization
>>     algorithm, 
>>
>>
>>     the knowledge graph is created aimed at making the computes all
>>     over the world to communicate with each other with a common
>>     language, and I have a question: Is scalability the key property
>>     of knowledge graph?
>>
>>
>> It depends on your scale. Otherwise how many users are you serving?
>> What kind of computation your are processing?
>>
>>     There are many knowledge vaults edited by different language(such
>>     as owl,rdf ),but is it always hard to merge them and there is not
>>     a standard knowledge vault on which we can do advanced
>>     development. So is it necessary to open a scalable and standard
>>     knowledge vault so that everyone can keep extended it and make it
>>     more perfect just like linux kernel or wiki pedia? What kind of
>>     knowledge should be contained in the standard knowledge vault so
>>     that it can be universal? 
>>
>> Some Desktop environment have create languages used by application to
>> interop the way you describe. It not world wide scale but still a
>> good example of how to create application that communicates between
>> them to create more value.
>>
>>     I imagine that the standard knowledge vault is an originator, and
>>     all of the other application copy the originator, then all of the
>>     other application can communicate under the same 
>>
>>
>> I think multinet describe very well this idea of "knowledge vault"
>> for applications of natural language processing.
>>
>>     common sense, for example when a application decelerate ''night",
>>     all of the other application will know it's dark.
>>
>>     As I know, the knowlege graph is implement as a query service,
>>     but is it possible to implement it as a program language,just
>>     like c++,java? In this way ,the compute can directly know nature
>>     language, and human can communicate with compute with nature
>>     language, also a compute can communicate with another compute
>>     with nature language.
>>
>>
>> This reminds me of this recent article about Natural Langue
>> Interfaces to Database Systems http://wp.sigmod.org/?p=2897
>

-- 
Regards

Chris
++++

Chief Executive, Lacibus <https://lacibus.net> Ltd
chris@lacibus.net