Re: What is a Knowledge Graph? CORRECTION

Chris
KG can also be any n-tuple, isnt it?

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 6:21 PM Chris Harding <chris@lacibus.net> wrote:

> I should have said that it is a collection of triples to which someone
> attaches meaning. The triples might or might not be in a triple store.
>
> Chris Harding wrote:
>
> What is a knowledge graph?
>
> I looked it up in Wikipedia, and the definition seemed to be "What Google
> does". Reading a bit more widely, I came to the conclusion that it is a
> triple store to which someone attaches meaning. (Of course, this is most,
> if not all, triple stores.) What is interesting is the impressive amount of
> theory and practice, associated with the "knowledge graph" label, for using
> AI and other techniques to obtain transformations or measurements of the
> triple stores that add to the meaning that people attach to them.
>
> I found these articles helpful:
> http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2322/dsi4-6.pdf
>
> https://towardsdatascience.com/neural-network-embeddings-explained-4d028e6f0526
> https://content.iospress.com/articles/data-science/ds007
>
> xyzscy wrote:
>
> Thank you for your response. I think the KG term is spread by GOOGLE,
> while I don’t how google implement it.  I used to think the semantic
> network  is the key technology of KG,but google has never statement that.
>
> 在 2019年6月13日，下午2:46，Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> 写道：
>
> Thank you for asking this,
>
> I  ll leave the experts to reply to scalability and other questions
>
> In general, much depends on the language one uses, which in turn
> depends on the domain (which planet you come from)
>
> When I first studied knowledge engineering, the expression knowledge graph
> was not in use at all. I was doing an MSc and studied the body of knowledge
> from ESPRIT project (some folks on this list worked on it)
>
> https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/193e/b66909b0c87d5dbcdbd6b20d78ed93fc95a7.pdf
>
>
>  I d be curious to learn when such term knowledge graph came in use and
> who coined it
>
> I then heard it in relation to the SW and this list, and always tried to
> figure out what exactly
> a KG is (in relation the wider Knowledge Representation domain I was
> studying)
>
> Knowledge graphs are a type of knowledge representation, and they can be
> visualized
> graphically, or represented using algebra (again, depends on what planet
> you are on)
> Engineers tend to use diagrams, others tend to use algebra
>
> But more importantly, is that they enable machine readability querying and
> computational manipulation of complex (combined) data sets, assuming
> knowledge is some kind of data in context, as some say.
> I dont use the term knowledge graph much either.  Let's see if the KG
> folks can offer more info
>
> PDM
> Knowledge Graph Representation
> *Knowledge graphs* provide a unified format for representing *knowledge* about
> relationships between entities. A *knowledge graph* is a collection of
> triples, with each triple (h,t,r) denoting the fact that relation r exists
> between head entity h and tail en- tity t.
> http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2322/dsi4-6.pdf
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 1:40 PM 我 <1047571207@qq.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear all:
>>
>> When I first touch knowledge graph, I'm very confused. Different from the
>> other AI theory,  it is not an pattern recognization algorithm which will
>> give some "output" given some "input"(such as classify algorithms) ,but a
>> program language(such as owl,rdf) and database(such as neo4j) instead. So
>> in my opinion, knowledge graph is more like a problem of engineering than
>> mathematic theory.
>>
>> Then I realized that different from the pattern recognization algorithm,
>> the knowledge graph is created aimed at making the computes all over the
>> world to  communicate with each other with a common language, and I have
>> a question: Is scalability the key property of knowledge graph?
>>
>> There are many knowledge vaults edited by different language(such as
>> owl,rdf ),but is it always hard to merge them and there is not a standard
>> knowledge vault  on which  we can do advanced  development. So is it
>> necessary to open a scalable  and standard knowledge vault so that
>> everyone can keep extended it and make it more perfect just like linux
>> kernel or  wiki pedia? What kind of knowledge should be contained in the standard
>> knowledge vault so that it can be universal?  I imagine that the standard
>> knowledge vault is an originator, and all of the other application copy
>> the originator, then all of the other application can communicate under
>> the same common sense, for example when a application decelerate ''night",
>> all of the other application will know it's dark.
>>
>> As I know, the knowlege graph is implement as a query service, but is it
>> possible to implement it  as a program language,just like c++,java? In this
>> way ,the compute can directly know nature language, and human can
>> communicate with compute with nature language, also a compute can communicate with
>> another compute with nature language.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Regards
>
> Chris
> ++++
>
> Chief Executive, Lacibus <https://lacibus.net> Ltd
> chris@lacibus.net
>
>
> --
> Regards
>
> Chris
> ++++
>
> Chief Executive, Lacibus <https://lacibus.net> Ltd
> chris@lacibus.net
>
>