- From: ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <metadataportals@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 17:48:06 +0000 (UTC)
- To: 我 <1047571207@qq.com>, <paoladimaio10@googlemail.com>
- Cc: semantic-web <semantic-web@w3.org>, W3C AIKR CG <public-aikr@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <711043010.736558.1560448086831@mail.yahoo.com>
It is possible to create KR that uses scalability. AS I have stated before it requires generalizing knowledge and will require the use of category theory which the categorizes the various domains of discourse in natural language, semiotics and symbols and provides KR formats. And again AGI is about understanding sensory input, natural language and symbols/semiotics processing combined with reasoning processes modeled after BICA (brain inspired cognitive architectures). ML and NN are just two limited ingredients for AI. Milton Ponson GSM: +297 747 8280 PO Box 1154, Oranjestad Aruba, Dutch Caribbean Project Paradigm: Bringing the ICT tools for sustainable development to all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative research on applied mathematics, advanced modeling, software and standards development On Thursday, June 13, 2019, 03:53:59 AM ADT, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote: Thank you for asking this, I ll leave the experts to reply to scalability and other questions In general, much depends on the language one uses, which in turndepends on the domain (which planet you come from) When I first studied knowledge engineering, the expression knowledge graphwas not in use at all. I was doing an MSc and studied the body of knowledgefrom ESPRIT project (some folks on this list worked on it)https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/193e/b66909b0c87d5dbcdbd6b20d78ed93fc95a7.pdf I d be curious to learn when such term knowledge graph came in use and who coined it I then heard it in relation to the SW and this list, and always tried to figure out what exactly a KG is (in relation the wider Knowledge Representation domain I was studying) Knowledge graphs are a type of knowledge representation, and they can be visualizedgraphically, or represented using algebra (again, depends on what planet you are on)Engineers tend to use diagrams, others tend to use algebra But more importantly, is that they enable machine readability querying and computational manipulation of complex (combined) data sets, assuming knowledge is some kind of data in context, as some say.I dont use the term knowledge graph much either. Let's see if the KG folks can offer more info PDMKnowledge Graph RepresentationKnowledge graphs provide a unified format for representing knowledge about relationships between entities. A knowledge graph is a collection of triples, with each triple (h,t,r) denoting the fact that relation r exists between head entity h and tail en- tity t. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2322/dsi4-6.pdf On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 1:40 PM 我 <1047571207@qq.com> wrote: Dear all: When I first touch knowledge graph, I'm very confused. Different from the other AI theory, it is not an pattern recognization algorithm which will give some "output" given some "input"(such as classify algorithms) ,but a program language(such as owl,rdf) and database(such as neo4j) instead. So in my opinion, knowledge graph is more like a problem of engineering than mathematic theory. Then I realized that different from the pattern recognization algorithm, the knowledge graph is created aimed at making the computes all over the world to communicate with each other with a common language, and I have a question: Is scalability the key property of knowledge graph? There are many knowledge vaults edited by different language(such as owl,rdf ),but is it always hard to merge them and there is not a standard knowledge vault on which we can do advanced development. So is it necessary to open a scalable and standard knowledge vault so that everyone can keep extended it and make it more perfect just like linux kernel or wiki pedia? What kind of knowledge should be contained in the standard knowledge vault so that it can be universal? I imagine that the standard knowledge vault is an originator, and all of the other application copy the originator, then all of the other application can communicate under the same common sense, for example when a application decelerate ''night", all of the other application will know it's dark. As I know, the knowlege graph is implement as a query service, but is it possible to implement it as a program language,just like c++,java? In this way ,the compute can directly know nature language, and human can communicate with compute with nature language, also a compute can communicate with another compute with nature language.
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2019 17:48:35 UTC