- From: Charles 'chaals' (McCathie) Nevile <chaals@yandex.ru>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 10:58:34 +0200
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
- Message-ID: <op.z29kjwhnag6dn2@chaalss-macbook-pro.home>
On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 08:00:01 +0200, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > Just yesterday Vice published an article on DeepFakes with two example > videos [...] > > How could one make publishing of deep fake content, and other fictional > content or data for that > matter allowable? We can’t live without fiction after all, it is how we > explore possibilities that are not > actual, if only to be able to avoid them becoming so. [1] > > One suggestion is that we would need a fiction ontology. Given that > an HTTP server that served these should it seems > 1. have a Link relation that specifies the fictional type of such > content > 2. Only serve the content to clients that recognize and display such > information clearly [2] > (requiring thus an agent capability ontology) > 3. Perhaps embed that relation in the video metadata too, along with a > link to the original author > (which can be verified by an http GET) so that copying the content > does not remove the metadata. This is exactly what current DRM systems do, except instead of a promise to recognise the content as fictional there is usually evidence that you paid money for it as the out-of-band basis for approval to send the content. cheers -- Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2019 08:59:04 UTC