- From: Jean-Marc Vanel <jeanmarc.vanel@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:25:51 +0200
- To: sgharms@stevengharms.com, semantic-web <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANwvFKDq8B9SLmdSxJYLFb=fuyTc8fCmtrwVFEi5oun9WmnF_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Le sam. 22 sept. 2018 15:59, Jean-Marc Vanel <jeanmarc.vanel@gmail.com> a écrit : > Stephen , please try semantic_forms , > > maintained, > user manual, > open source, > formatting and editing and more, > sandbox here: > http://semantic-forms.cc:9111/ > enter serious data here: > http://semantic-forms.cc:9112 > Answers interleaved below. > JMV > > > > Le sam. 22 sept. 2018 à 15:43, Steven Harms <sgharms@stevengharms.com> a > écrit : > >> *Note: Vocabulary choice might be off below. Read with maximal >> flexibility* >> >> After reading up on RDF, vocabulary authoring, and getting to know a >> number of vocabularies, I want to populate a collection. However, when I >> make my first steps in this regard I find myself both hindered and confused >> by lack of tooling. >> >> *Interface: *As an example, I'd expect to be able to find a tool that >> lets one import vocabularies to the tool >> > SF allows to import any RDF HTTP data source, so any vocabulary can be imported. For convenience tens of vocabularies are preloaded. as the available options with authoring statements. >> > part of sentence not understood Given the "triple," I'd expect to select a subject, predicate, object as >> chosen from those data provided by the cached vocabularies >> > Vocabularies do not provide data, they declare properties and classes used in data. SF displays all triples with the requested subject URI. In edit mode user changes triple objects, with completion on URI label. For example, when editing a foaf.knows triple, typing Van triggers a completion proposal for the URI of a foaf.Person relevntm in his case my FOAF profile. >> When I look for such a thing ( >> https://www.w3.org/wiki/AuthoringToolsForRDF), the tools are mostly > 10 >> years old with few updates and no *de facto* standard. In general, most >> searches to find an authoring platform point to dead links or bit-rotted >> pages. Ultimately, this leads me to ask whether my understanding is correct. >> >> Questions: >> >> 1. Is authoring like I described above >> > Sorry. but your description is too vague. If you try SF, and features are missing, I m likely to implement them. > desirable, expected? Is it hoped that individuals would think "Hm, instead >> of a bulleted list in a Google Doc, I'll add these notes using (sought RDF >> tool)." Or is the expectation that some other storage / interface / >> solution that emits RDF will be the primary interface? >> >> 2. Assuming individual authorship *is* a desired thing, is the >> "Interface" I described above a reasonable sketch of the user experience? >> >> 3. Assuming individual authorship as desirable and the UX as appropriate, >> why doesn't that (seem to?) exist? >> >> While I doubt that RDF Collections will be used for casual shopping-lists >> etc., there are a number of places where they ought be useful in both home >> and business (e.g. `home:photoAlbum2009A schema:about >> lifeEvents:tripToLondon`) and being able to author them in a pleasant UI >> that enriches a collection in a virtuous cycle seems to be the future this >> group is striving toward. >> >> Clarifications will be greatly appreciated, >> >> Steven >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Steven G. Harms >> PGP: E6052DAF >> <https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x337AF45BE6052DAF> >> > > > -- > Jean-Marc Vanel > > http://www.semantic-forms.cc:9111/display?displayuri=http://jmvanel.free.fr/jmv.rdf%23me#subject > <http://www.semantic-forms.cc:9111/display?displayuri=http://jmvanel.free.fr/jmv.rdf%23me> > Rule-based programming, Semantic Web > +33 (0)6 89 16 29 52 > Twitter: @jmvanel , @jmvanel_fr ; chat: irc://irc.freenode.net#eulergui > Chroniques jardin > <http://semantic-forms.cc:1952/backlinks?q=http%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FChronicle> >
Received on Monday, 24 September 2018 10:26:30 UTC