- From: William Waites <wwaites@tardis.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 15:26:57 +0000
- To: Jürgen Jakobitsch <juergen.jakobitsch@semantic-web.com>
- Cc: Hugh Glaser <hugh@glasers.org>, dsr@w3.org, aaa@bzfx.net, phayes@ihmc.us, timbl@w3.org, david@dbooth.org, semantic-web@w3.org, danbri@google.com, sean@miscoranda.com, olaf.hartig@liu.se, axel@polleres.net
> honestly, if those guys [1] get by without literals as subject, i think > everybody should :-) Hah! Sure, but there’s a deeper problem that this exposes. It’s the absence of any real way to specify context for reasoning. It’s the reason why it’s normal to ignore the meaning of owl:sameAs or simply avoid using it. If you take all the triples and try to apply all the rules, you get nonsense. Having literals as subject is not the source of the nonsense. The nonsense is caused by having no standard way to do reasoning while keeping the results under control. Cheers, -w
Received on Monday, 26 November 2018 15:27:24 UTC