Re: "Language-tagged strings Re: Toward easier RDF: a proposal"

On 11/23/18 7:52 AM, Dave Raggett wrote:
>> On 23 Nov 2018, at 12:03, Hugh Glaser wrote:
>> Surely languages and datatypes should simply be RDF properties of 
>> Literals, which are 1 component things?
>> Much easier to explain to developers, and for them to use.
>> (If indeed they want to use raw RDF.)
> That also fits in nicely with making it easier to represent property graphs.

I agree, and I think this idea merits more exploration, though I largely 
agree with Andy about the evaluation criterion:

 > On 23 Nov 2018, at 11:48, Andy Seaborne wrote:
 > "technically better" isn't the criterion, it should be
 > "unlocks potential that is currently . . . blocked".

David Booth

Received on Friday, 23 November 2018 14:41:29 UTC