- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 09:41:06 -0500
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
On 11/23/18 7:52 AM, Dave Raggett wrote: >> On 23 Nov 2018, at 12:03, Hugh Glaser wrote: >> Surely languages and datatypes should simply be RDF properties of >> Literals, which are 1 component things? >> Much easier to explain to developers, and for them to use. >> (If indeed they want to use raw RDF.) > > That also fits in nicely with making it easier to represent property graphs. I agree, and I think this idea merits more exploration, though I largely agree with Andy about the evaluation criterion: > On 23 Nov 2018, at 11:48, Andy Seaborne wrote: > "technically better" isn't the criterion, it should be > "unlocks potential that is currently . . . blocked". David Booth
Received on Friday, 23 November 2018 14:41:29 UTC