- From: Hugh Glaser <hugh@glasers.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 12:28:32 +0000
- To: Andreas Harth <andreas@harth.org>
- Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Thanks mate. And for Graphs I see: " • Zero or more named graphs. Each named graph is a pair consisting of an IRI or a blank node (the graph name), and an RDF graph. Graph names are unique within an RDF dataset." (https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#dfn-named-graph) So that means that the Graph position (in a quad) can't be a Literal, I guess :-( And even Blank nodes are problematic in SPARQL. Mind you, I have never understood (© Hugh Glaser :-)) why I can't just specify quads in SPARQL. Or maybe that is essentially what "GRAPH ?g { ?s ?p ?o }" is a longhand for. > On 23 Nov 2018, at 10:46, Andreas Harth <andreas@harth.org> wrote: > > On 11/23/18 12:28 AM, Hugh Glaser wrote: >> Pat, presumably if I can have literals in subject position, I can have them in the predicate position too? >> That would be great (I have no idea what it means, but it would still be great not to have to explain another exception :-) ) > > RDF 1.1 already defines a generalised triple as UBL x UBL x UBL [1], whereas ter Horst's definition of a generalised triple is UB x UB x UBL [2] (page 18, formula 26). > > Best regards, > Andreas. > > [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-generalized-rdf > [2] http://www.websemanticsjournal.org/index.php/ps/article/download/66/64 > -- Hugh 023 8061 5652
Received on Friday, 23 November 2018 12:29:02 UTC