- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 14:28:25 -0700
- To: Richard Smith <richard@ex-parrot.com>, Andreas Harth <andreas@harth.org>
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2018 21:28:56 UTC
On 3/6/18 9:43 AM, Richard Smith wrote: > Andreas Harth wrote: > [...] >> The RDF 1.1 semantics spec gives that example and implicitely derives >> that entailment from the XSD specification (I think). > > Having thought about this in some more detail, I think I now > understand it. > > So far as I can tell, none of the RDF specs formally defines the > lexical-to-value mapping of the RDF-compatible XSD types. I'd expect > it to be defined in ยง5.1 of RDF 1.1 Concepts but it is not said > explictly. Nevertheless, I'm sure it's intended that the lexical > space, value space and lexical-to-value mapping of these types for the > purpose of RDF is the same as their lexical space, value space and > lexical mapping as defined in XSD. Yes, I would say that this is the intended meaning of "IRIs <https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#dfn-iri> of the form |http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#/xxx/|, where |/xxx/| is the name of a datatype, denote the built-in datatypes defined in /XML Schema 1.1 Part 2: Datatypes" <http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/>/in 5.1 of RDF 1.1 Concepts.// It probably would have been better to make this blindingly obvious, however. [...] > > Richard peter
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2018 21:28:56 UTC