- From: Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 15:14:58 +0100
- To: semantic-web@w3.org, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
Dear Harry, all,
On this matter as well as all others we are debating passionately, it's important to uphold the Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct [1] that is in effect. It calls for civil discussion, for communicating constructively, offering objective work criticism, etc. This is the standard of conversation we expect and are serious about.
Section 3.1 “Individual Participation Criteria” of the W3C Process Document [2] reminds that
{{
Participants in any W3C activity must abide by the terms and spirit of the W3C Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct […]
}}
Thank you,
Coralie Mercier, Head of W3C Marketing & Communications
[1] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/cepc/
[2] https://www.w3.org/2018/Process-20180201/#ParticipationCriteria
On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:57:05 +0000, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org> wrote:
>
> As I have pointed out many times, […]
> So I basically consider it a solvable problem
> that requires real work, but until I see real work I consider Sarven’s
> posts to basically be pointless spam and borderline trolling.
>
> Since I have no desire to see spam in my inbox, I will unsubscribe from
> this mailing list quite shortly likely.
--
Coralie Mercier - W3C Marketing & Communications - https://www.w3.org
mailto:coralie@w3.org +337 810 795 22 https://www.w3.org/People/CMercier/
Received on Thursday, 22 February 2018 14:15:11 UTC