W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > December 2018

Re: Toward easier RDF: a proposal

From: Timea Turdean <timea.turdean@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:42:37 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKNZRAXpLcqtBn2rN64EjOhy_uyD_o3kB5T9msmQL2OiVqWXhA@mail.gmail.com>
To: franconi@inf.unibz.it
Cc: david@dbooth.org, brunni@netestate.de, semantic-web@w3.org
Hi,

Thanks for gathering the aspects on https://github.com/w3c/EasierRDF
As a developer who was involved in online course creation about Semantic
Web I want to give this issue a different spin. A few ideas:

   - If I want to start on new technologies, sometimes I just lack the good
   ideas that motivate me to start creating something - how about a list of
   small to advanced features/projects that help you learn? (open source
   projects one can fork and start off)
   - a collection of resources on how to get started is also not quite
   prominent out there yet, good solid resources. (I recently use
   https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/ a lot because of my current needs -> not
   related to semantic web)
   - I would also follow something like live coding sessions (idea:
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=85RRL4eIUb8)

Regards,
Timea

On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 at 18:09, Franconi Enrico <franconi@inf.unibz.it> wrote:

> Hi,
> I believe that, in order to properly/correctly solve this issue, SPARQL
> implementations could provide a mean to get for each bnode in a SPARQL
> query answer the data graph node **bound** to it, e.g., for each SPARQL
> query result  there could be a table with bindings: <result-bnode,
> data-graph-node>.
> IMHO it would be wrong (and not necessary, in this case) to give
> persistent identifiers to bnodes.
> cheers
> --e.
>
>
> On 10 Dec 2018, at 17:30, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote:
>
> On 12/10/18 5:34 AM, Michael Brunnbauer wrote:
>
> I'd really like to see mandatory persistent blank node identifiers in
> SPARQL - so I can easily do followup queries for blank nodes from a SPARQL
> result. Is this a big deal? I think some triples stores can already do
> this.
> Which issue do I upvote to get this?
>
>
> Blank nodes #19:
> https://github.com/w3c/EasierRDF/issues/19
>
> David Booth
>
>
>

-- 

Software Engineer @Semantic Web Company <https://www.semantic-web.at/>
Diversity Lead @GDGVienna <http://www.gdg-vienna.at/> & @
WomenTechmakersVienna <http://womentechmakers.at/>
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2018 16:47:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:42:03 UTC