W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > December 2018

Re: Blank Nodes Re: Toward easier RDF: a proposal

From: Anthony Moretti <anthony.moretti@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 14:10:08 -0800
Message-ID: <CACusdfSsta9YzVnaO0F0fpG4mtywd+Kd6rBL9Mg5ZfVnY73mqQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: William Waites <wwaites@tardis.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, nathan@webr3.org, phayes@ihmc.us, tl@rat.io
Cheers for agreeing William. On the topic of incomplete blank nodes Henry
I'd give them another type, the partial address example you give I'd give
the type AddressComponent, or something to that effect. I could be wrong,
but it's not a valid Address if it's a blank node and no other information
in the graph completes it.


On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 1:56 PM William Waites <wwaites@tardis.ed.ac.uk>

> > standards like schema:PostalAddress should possibly define relevant
> > operations like equality checking too.
> Exactly.
Received on Monday, 3 December 2018 22:10:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:57 UTC