this is unproductive, pointless even. On 28 Oct 2017 13:50, "Martynas Jusevičius" <martynas@atomgraph.com> wrote: > I'm quite sure if you aggregated the usage of Apache Jena and RDF4J, it > would be more than the rest combined. > > To put something N3.js on the same level as Jena is quite a stretch, > feature-wise. > > On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Wouter Beek <w.g.j.beek@vu.nl> wrote: > >> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Martynas Jusevičius < >> martynas@atomgraph.com> wrote: >> >>> Exactly. Plus all the mature RDF libraries are written in Java, not JS. >>> >> >> Obviously incorrect statement. >> >> Mature RDF libraries exist in very many languages: Python (rdflib), Ruby >> (RDF.rb), C (Redland Raptor), JavaScript (N3.js), Java (RDF4J), Scala >> (Banana RDF), Prolog (ClioPatria), C# (dotNetRDF), and many more. >> >> Good programmers typically master more than one language. Great >> programmers are not afraid to learn new stuff. >> >> --- >> Cheers, >> Wouter. >> > >
Received on Saturday, 28 October 2017 12:54:52 UTC