- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 09:47:16 +0000
- To: Carl Wimmer <carl@correlationconcepts.com>, "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <D5780135E58FC940BDB87E7D499910184B4C583E@MBXP14.ds.man.ac.uk>
* > Yes, lots of research ... but only in private companies. > They are surging ahead. Certainly on the Big-Data front, yes. But still quite a bit of academic research as well! Personally I am quite happy for industry to be catching on – for a while there was a sad trend of Semantic Web researchers disconnecting with technology and the Web – somehow being stuck on the S of SW, often not even putting their “Semantic Web” data on the web. During this decade I think this has luckily converged back, thanks to efforts like Schema.org and industry uptake. We might have lost a few in S-land, but they’ll survive. (Be aware of papers with not a single URI inside!) You may want to have a look at the ISWC2017 programme – conference starts in two weeks time, but the papers are freely available online (although in PDF format). You may particularly want to have a look at the more pragmatic “Resource” and “In-Use” tracks. https://iswc2017.semanticweb.org/program/accepted-papers/ { Rant of the day: Still waiting for Semantic Web researchers and venues to eat-your-own-dog-food – see for instance https://www2018.thewebconf.org/ which for some reasons only accepts “Web” papers as PDFs in ACM layout. Why? Somehow publishing in Computer Science have hardly changed format at all since the golden years – unlike other domains we’re still worshiping the style of a by-gone era, as in this (I admit beautiful) ALGOL paper I found on a colleague’s desk the other day https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1002164 -- except for the front pages you couldn’t tell it is from 1964! } -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, eScience Lab School of Computer Science, The University of Manchester http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
Received on Thursday, 12 October 2017 09:47:44 UTC