Re: Type of string literals in RDF

If I get what you're asking, non-typed literals are treated as xsd:string
literals since RDF 1.1:
https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-new/#literals

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:08 AM, Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> wrote:

> I am developing a rather complex RDF vocabulary.
>
> Some data is in string format. For example, I use string literals to
> describe a Unix command to be executed by my software. Or for another
> example, I use strings to describe XSLT parameter names. Or to describe
> program version numbers such as "11.3".
>
> My question: When validating an RDF file, should I check that these
> strings are of xsd:string type? or should I accept arbitrary types of
> such "string" literals?
>
> What is better from the viewpoint of complex system design?
>
>