- From: <Simon.Cox@csiro.au>
- Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 05:11:02 +0000
- To: <jindong.kim@gmail.com>, <jyoung@oclc.org>
- CC: <michel.dumontier@gmail.com>, <info@csarven.ca>, <semantic-web@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 18 May 2017 05:11:56 UTC
Or how about (reaching back into the dark origins of RDF where reification was a thing) :I-am rdf:type rdf:Statement ; rdf:subject :I-am ; . From: Jin-Dong Kim [mailto:jindong.kim@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 18 May, 2017 14:58 To: Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org> Cc: Michel Dumontier <michel.dumontier@gmail.com>; Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>; W3C Semantic Web IG <semantic-web@w3.org> Subject: Re: I am. Sadly, I can't, in relational thinking. I need another object holding a relationship with me (except the world), or a property of me which I would like to talk of, to make a statement in RDF. I may be able to state: <http://example.org/I> a owl:Thing which, however, is meaningless with the open world assumption. With no relationship and no interesting property, I may not exist in the world, or may be. JD
Received on Thursday, 18 May 2017 05:11:56 UTC