- From: Lukas Rosenstock <lukas@cloudobjects.io>
- Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:25:03 +0200
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Cc: W3C Semantic Web IG <semantic-web@w3.org>, public-rdf-shapes@w3.org, public-shex@w3.org
- Message-Id: <49FEB9A2-3B47-471E-B05B-B4B2A14C527A@cloudobjects.io>
Hello! ShEx looks interesting and seems to fill a gap in terms of defining constraints for RDF documents! I have a quick question in terms of understanding the semantics and how they relate to existing RDF, apologies in advance if it’s a dumb question. I’m basing this on the example in the Quick Start of the Primer. There is inst:Student1. Where is it defined that inst:Student1 is to be validated against ex:Enrollee? My understanding would be that it would have to be stated that inst:Student1 rdf:type ex:Enrollee., which implies that ex:Enrollee rdf:type rdfs:Class, shex:Shape. or even shex:Shape rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Class.. Does that make any sense or am I going in a wrong direction with my thinking? Regards, Lukas Rosenstock > Am 28.03.2017 um 10:43 schrieb Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>: > > he ShEx Community Group would like to invite public review of three deliverables: > > Shape Expressions (ShEx) Primer http://shex.io/shex-primer/ > Shape Expressions Language 2.0 http://shex.io/shex-semantics/ > Shape Expressions Test Suite https://github.com/shexSpec/shexTest/ including: > * 337 schemas in three representations: > ShExC: compact syntax > ShExJ: JSON-LD 1.0 syntax > ShExR: Turtle syntax > * 927 validation tests. > * 101 ShExC negative syntax tests > * 7 negative structure tests. > > The test suite has a Implementation Report including 4 of the 5 implementations: > http://shexspec.github.io/shexTest/reports/ > > For feature requests please note the features in the 2.1 milestone: > https://github.com/shexSpec/shex/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A2.1 > > Many of these have been implemented and tested but are not in this version of > the specification. We invite feedback from the community on issues with the > documents or tests, new feature prioritization and new feature use cases. > > Comments are welcome on the ShEx Community Group mailing list (archived): > public-shex@w3.org > > Readers may also wish to join the ShEx Community Group: > https://www.w3.org/community/shex/join > > Sincerely, > Andra Waagmeester > Dimitris Kontokostas > Eric Prud'hommeaux > Gregg Kellogg > Harold Solbrig > Iovka Boneva > Jose Emilio Labra Gayo > Karen Coyle > Katherine Thornton > Tom Baker >
Received on Wednesday, 29 March 2017 10:27:59 UTC