Re: Some minor changes on the RDFa context document

My apologies, you are right. I mixed up with the csvw context.

That being said, I wonder whether it would be a good idea to provide a general json-ld context with those prefixes, to be kept on /ns. We may want to see that with the JSON-LD community; it is not a big deal to have it and it may come handy.

Ivan

> On 7 Jan 2017, at 00:46, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net <mailto:gregg@greggkellogg.net>> wrote:
> 
>> On Jan 5, 2017, at 6:51 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org <mailto:ivan@w3.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> Two entries have been added to the list of "reserved" prefixes, ie, those that may be included into the official vocabulary prefixes. These are odrl and as.
>> 
>> While these have no effect on current implementations and usage of RDFa and JSON-LD, be advised that, in the coming 1-2 months, three new prefixes may be added to the list:
> 
> Note that JSON-LD does not use pre-defined prefixes, so there’s no change necessary here. However, recall that CSVW does use the same prefixes as RDFa, so we’ll want to update the CSVW context accordingly.
> 
> Gregg
> 
>> oa: Web Annotation vocabulary
>> as: Activity (Streams) vocabulary
>> dqv: Data Quality Vocabulary
>> 
>> The first two are part of planned Recommendations; the third one is defined through an (already published) W3C Note. These changes may require a minor update on existing RDFa implementations.
>> 
>> Cheers
>> 
>> Ivan
>> 
>> 
>> [1] https://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/rdfa-1.1 <https://www.w3.org/2011/rdfa-context/rdfa-1.1>
>> 
>> ----
>> Ivan Herman, W3C
>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ <http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/>
>> mobile: +31-641044153
>> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 <http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704>
>> 
>> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Technical Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ <http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/>
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 <http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704>