- From: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
- Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 18:09:11 +0200
- To: semantic-web <semantic-web@w3.org>
I want to have a structure like this (in Turtle): http://we.example.org rdfs:seeAlso (<http://x1.example.org> <http://x2.example.org>) . But sometimes I want my seeAlso to be conditional, so I could specify that some of the seeAlso resources are used only in "transformation" mode or only in "validation" mode, like this: http://we.example.org rdfs:seeAlso ( [ :iri <http://x1.example.org> ; :transformation: false ] [ :iri <http://x2.example.org> ; :validation: false ] ) . However in this case I use a blank node instead of a IRI. My question: Is it OK (or a heresy) to do different thing for a blank node rather than for an explicit IRI? Isn't there the invariant that if blank nodes are replaced with unique IRIs then the meaning should not change? (And the above does NOT conform to this invariant.) If to conform to this variant, the first example would become instead: http://we.example.org rdfs:seeAlso ([ :iri <http://x1.example.org> ] [ :iri <http://x2.example.org> ]) . what seems not concise enough. What to do?
Received on Saturday, 23 December 2017 16:09:51 UTC