- From: Sebastian Samaruga <ssamarug@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 19:38:59 -0300
- To: Peter Brooks <peter.h.m.brooks@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C Semantic Web IG <semantic-web@w3.org>, DBpedia <Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>, public-rww <public-rww@w3.org>, pragmaticweb@lists.spline.inf.fu-berlin.de
- Message-ID: <CAOLUXBtWps5O368TmOpWV_X1KVPwNvgwDmVEkT=CsesMu7pSow@mail.gmail.com>
I really apologize for my vague approach of trying to specify something. Scarcity of resources and time prevents me from doing any code until now. I'm basically trying to state that a XML/XSL like approach is viable also for Semantic Web driven integration. I also emphasize the fact that alignment models (incomplete in the document) via aggregation and inference could allow for schema / identity / ontology matching, links and attributes entailment and a 'contextual' order alignment of entities so it is possible to 'compare' meaningful things, such as cause / effect relations. I also think all this could be provided by means of simple / complex aggregation of basic SPO RDF datasources, maybe the ones at hand providing from any database or services. Updated link and document: https://github.com/CognescentBI/BISemantics/blob/master/Document.pdf?raw=true Sorry again. Although I recognize you are right, I don't have any means yet as to start coding. Regards, Sebastián. On Dec 21, 2017 1:35 AM, "Peter Brooks" <peter.h.m.brooks@gmail.com> wrote: > The usefulness of coding it up is that it gives clarity. It's easy to > posit things in a vaguely convincing (to yourself, to begin with) way, > but coding the detail, even for an hypothetical example, exposes the > bits you've not thought of, enabling clarity of thought. > > On 21 December 2017 at 00:59, Sebastian Samaruga <ssamarug@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I know I've been publishing a series of posts that maybe lacks of > academic > > formality or shape / coherence. My intentions are not to spam the lists > with > > content that maybe don't deserve the reading time of the subscribers. > That's > > why I warn everybody that I'm just a Semantic 'hobbyist' dumping > thoughts in > > a bottle. > > > > Feel free to skip reading my mesagges. Although sometimes I receive very > > valuable feedback, sometimes people seems bothered with what I publish. > > > > My attempt now is finally to start writting code. I've added an appendix > to > > the document which explains details I didn't realized in the past and > which > > are fundamental for the deployment of an implementation (WIP, fuzzy > draft). > > I've also suffered of paralysis in an 'analysis' phase in which because > of > > lack knowledge and work responsabilities I couldn't code much. > > > > The idea is to write a very small functional API library for the > processing > > of streams (bus) of models of knowledge (resources) and their contexts > > (templates) from which to apply aggregation and alignment / inference. > Then, > > given opportune APIs, provide implementations of connectors and > 'deployers' > > wrapper endpoints > > > > Again, this is a very fuzzy early draft of a document WIP which doesn't > > qualify yet even as an analysis or specification document. But it's > useful > > for me to post it, even as a reminder of the work progress I've doing. > > > > https://github.com/CognescentBI/BISemantics/blob/ > master/Document.pdf?raw=true > > > > Thanks, > > Sebastián. > > > > > > -- > Peter Brooks > > > Mobile: +27 82 717 6404 > Direct: +27 21 447 9752 > Skype: Fustbariclation > Twitter: Fustbariclation > Google+: Fustbariclation > Author Page: amazon.com/author/peter_brooks >
Attachments
- application/pdf attachment: Specification.pdf
Received on Thursday, 21 December 2017 22:40:06 UTC