W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > December 2017

Re: Working draft (revisited)

From: Sebastian Samaruga <ssamarug@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 19:38:59 -0300
Message-ID: <CAOLUXBtWps5O368TmOpWV_X1KVPwNvgwDmVEkT=CsesMu7pSow@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Brooks <peter.h.m.brooks@gmail.com>
Cc: W3C Semantic Web IG <semantic-web@w3.org>, DBpedia <Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>, public-rww <public-rww@w3.org>, pragmaticweb@lists.spline.inf.fu-berlin.de
I really apologize for my vague approach of trying to specify something.
Scarcity of resources and time prevents me from doing any code until now.

I'm basically trying to state that a XML/XSL like approach is viable also
for Semantic Web driven integration. I also emphasize the fact that
alignment models (incomplete in the document) via aggregation and inference
could allow for schema / identity / ontology matching, links and attributes
entailment and a 'contextual' order alignment of entities so it is possible
to 'compare' meaningful things, such as cause / effect relations.

I also think all this could be provided by means of simple / complex
aggregation of basic SPO RDF datasources, maybe the ones at hand providing
from any database or services. Updated link and document:

https://github.com/CognescentBI/BISemantics/blob/master/Document.pdf?raw=true

Sorry again. Although I recognize you are right, I don't have any means yet
as to start coding. Regards,

Sebastián.

On Dec 21, 2017 1:35 AM, "Peter Brooks" <peter.h.m.brooks@gmail.com> wrote:

> The usefulness of coding it up is that it gives clarity. It's easy to
> posit things in a vaguely convincing (to yourself, to begin with) way,
> but coding the detail, even for an hypothetical example, exposes the
> bits you've not thought of, enabling clarity of thought.
>
> On 21 December 2017 at 00:59, Sebastian Samaruga <ssamarug@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I know I've been publishing a series of posts that maybe lacks of
> academic
> > formality or shape / coherence. My intentions are not to spam the lists
> with
> > content that maybe don't deserve the reading time of the subscribers.
> That's
> > why I warn everybody that I'm just a Semantic 'hobbyist' dumping
> thoughts in
> > a bottle.
> >
> > Feel free to skip reading my mesagges. Although sometimes I receive very
> > valuable feedback, sometimes people seems bothered with what I publish.
> >
> > My attempt now is finally to start writting code. I've added an appendix
> to
> > the document which explains details I didn't realized in the past and
> which
> > are fundamental for the deployment of an implementation (WIP, fuzzy
> draft).
> > I've also suffered of paralysis in an 'analysis' phase in which because
> of
> > lack knowledge and work responsabilities I couldn't code much.
> >
> > The idea is to write a very small functional API library for the
> processing
> > of streams (bus) of models of knowledge (resources) and their contexts
> > (templates) from which to apply aggregation and alignment / inference.
> Then,
> > given opportune APIs, provide implementations of connectors and
> 'deployers'
> > wrapper endpoints
> >
> > Again, this is a very fuzzy early draft of a document WIP which doesn't
> > qualify yet even as an analysis or specification document. But it's
> useful
> > for me to post it, even as a reminder of the work progress I've doing.
> >
> > https://github.com/CognescentBI/BISemantics/blob/
> master/Document.pdf?raw=true
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sebastián.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Peter Brooks
>
>
> Mobile: +27 82 717 6404
> Direct:  +27 21 447 9752
> Skype:  Fustbariclation
> Twitter: Fustbariclation
> Google+: Fustbariclation
> Author Page: amazon.com/author/peter_brooks
>

Received on Thursday, 21 December 2017 22:40:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:50:51 UTC