Re: Feedback (BI)

Sorry, seems the attachment was missing.

On Nov 30, 2016 5:31 AM, "Sebastian Samaruga" <ssamarug@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi, sorry again. As I can see from my last replies I see that I'm an
> ignorant in the field of semantic applications and technologies at all. All
> I have is this draft where I'm reinventing the wheel, perhaps... What I
> really have the need is a set of (separated) tools for basic CRUD /
> Business Rules / Event Processing / Workflow and Business Intelligence, all
> this in a 'declarative' fashion of building applications.
>
> I think that giving a tweak and revolving a little around RDF would give
> me the answer to those 'meaning related'. That produces this series of
> documents I'm publishing and I apologize for the times and very poor
> quality of what I've published.
>
> By request of other members I fully rewrote the document in the hope I can
> made clear my point in how a component/service may be implemented (it tries
> to serve as an specification doc) to ease the implementation of semantic
> technology in the enterprise.
>
> It's far to be complete and what I need help the most is in being clear in
> the concepts I try to explain about the best way to implement it. I sent
> documents before to the list and they seem clear to me. But later, given
> advice from others, I've found lots of confuse things in them.
>
> So, forgive me for over posting, but this iterations are of much help. I'm
> not an expert and have spare time to write. Maybe its better stop writing
> and see real working SW applications and follow the patterns learned from
> them. I'm very interested in 'augmentation', dashboard components (maybe
> Apache Stanbol?) for BI analysis/mining (mine triplestores?).
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Regards,
> Sebastián.
>