- From: Nathan Rixham <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 21:53:58 +0100
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: Hugh Glaser <hugh@glasers.org>, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>, Michael Brunnbauer <brunni@netestate.de>, Semantic Web IG <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANiy74yQ3jvOUGTRs3ofTugcqJhWdRW5UkmjuWM-ECfXiqPX2w@mail.gmail.com>
I meant your D :) Would need that one owl:sameAs triple (probably added after the update) On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> wrote: > > On May 21, 2016, at 9:48 AM, Nathan Rixham <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: > > That's what I was thinking about, with such a property (x:canonical) you > as a maintainer of data could choose to do one of three things, in code I > assume, when encountered: > > A) do nothing > B) store all inferred triples (one triple for each http and each https > uri) > C) run a graph update > > How about > > D) run a graph update but add one owl:sameas triple (or whatever the > appropriate more exotic assertion of identity is going to be) for each URI > that has been updated, to make it possible to use this RDF with legacy RDF. > > Maybe that is your B) ? > > I know I'd opt for c in most cases. > > What would be your solution for how to record the fact that the old URIs > in other RDF is supposed to be replaced by the new URIs your graph is now > using? Or is that just someone else's problem? > > Pat > > I'm about to run in to this on a domain for a client with 199m triples > that's going to swap to http2/https. The HTML pages are easy, 301 + rel > canonical. The rdf files could be the same easily, one would hope. > On 21 May 2016 5:31 pm, "Hugh Glaser" <hugh@glasers.org> wrote: > >> lol >> >> And apparently we are not allowed to discuss the idea of RDF being >> broken, by the way, so bad boys you and Nathan! >> >> Nathan, can we please think about the scale of this thing. >> Firstly, I have just counted the model files on one of many, many, >> domains I maintain - there are 3406702. >> This represents a bunch of RDF that is also held in an RDF store, along >> with other RDF - and served from there as Linked Data. >> There are 62375696 different URIs in this one dataset alone. >> >> Now the real problem(!): these URIs are widely distributed among a large >> number of model files, RDF stores and sameAs services. >> >> I’m not going to poke my nose (as yet perhaps!) into suggesting any >> solutions (I agree there is a problem); but the idea of fixing things by >> rewriting legacy RDF, or introducing owl:sameAs, or some other predicate++, >> for all the URIs in the world seems to me to ignore the practical aspects >> of a serious amount of RDF. >> We might just be finally getting to the stage of having a breadth of real >> applications using RDF; telling people to go away and change everything is >> a recipe for convincing people that RDF has failed (which I hasten to add >> it hasn’t!). >> >> Best >> Hugh >> >> > On 21 May 2016, at 17:05, Michael Brunnbauer <brunni@netestate.de> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > Hello Nathan, >> > >> > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 04:55:13PM +0100, Nathan Rixham wrote: >> >>> The day that that "a" in Turtle/SPARQL represents >> >> https://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type instead of >> >> http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type will be the day when >> RDF >> >> breaks. >> >> >> >> If RDF breaks because somebody can't open a file and string replace a >> with >> >> b in some code then save, a 20 second fix, it's already broken. >> > >> > The dby when everybody who ever used RDF opens b file bnd replbces b >> with b. >> > >> > Regbrds, >> > >> > Michbel Brunnbbuer >> > >> > -- >> > ++ Michael Brunnbauer >> > ++ netEstate GmbH >> > ++ Geisenhausener Straße 11a >> > ++ 81379 München >> > ++ Tel +49 89 32 19 77 80 >> > ++ Fax +49 89 32 19 77 89 >> > ++ E-Mail brunni@netestate.de >> > ++ http://www.netestate.de/ >> > ++ >> > ++ Sitz: München, HRB Nr.142452 (Handelsregister B München) >> > ++ USt-IdNr. DE221033342 >> > ++ Geschäftsführer: Michael Brunnbauer, Franz Brunnbauer >> > ++ Prokurist: Dipl. Kfm. (Univ.) Markus Hendel >> >> -- >> Hugh >> 023 8061 5652 >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------ > IHMC (850)434 8903 home > 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office > Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax > FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile (preferred) > phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes > > > > > >
Received on Saturday, 21 May 2016 20:54:26 UTC