- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 01:42:29 +0200
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Cc: Semantic Web IG <semantic-web@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 20 May 2016 23:42:58 UTC
On 20 May 2016 at 20:08, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: > Not a moan about spam, or a CfP, but an actual discussion point, yay! > > I've just blogged about our use of HTTPS across www.w3.org which raises > some questions for this community. Please see > https://www.w3.org/blog/2016/05/https-and-the-semantic-weblinked-data/ On the one hand more security is a nice to have, but on the other, Cool URIs dont change. It's really hard to estimate the cost, and unintended consequences of changing URIs. But my feeling is that we systematically underestimate it. IMHO, It's kind of a shame that http wasnt made secure, and that a new scheme https was invented. > > > Comments welcome. > > Thanks > > -- > > > Phil Archer > W3C Data Activity Lead > http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ > > http://philarcher.org > +44 (0)7887 767755 > @philarcher1 > >
Received on Friday, 20 May 2016 23:42:58 UTC