W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > February 2016

Re: [ontolog-forum] Current Semantic Web Layer Cake

From: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 17:08:27 -0600
Message-ID: <CAMVTWDyRdyjW8=53UOSADW+fcFVWGk8zdJQjBdfxZ_0541i10Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Natanael Arndt <arndtn@gmail.com>
Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
talk about a blast from the past!!!

RDF is a graph data model.
RDFS,OWL,SKOS are schema, ontology, taxonomy languages
SPARQL is a graph query language.

That's all I care about. That is all I talk about (if I even have to talk
about this detail).

Got to keep it simple.



--
Juan Sequeda, Ph.D
+1-575-SEQ-UEDA
www.juansequeda.com

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Natanael Arndt <arndtn@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Juan,
> did you find any answer to to this question?
>
> And is the 2007/03 Version still the current Layer Cake?
>
> Thank you
> Natanael
>
> On 30 Jul 2007, at 11:42, Juan Sequeda wrote:
> >
> > Is there a specific document that explains the layer cake?
> >
> > On 7/30/07, Kathryn Blackmond Laskey <klaskey@gmu.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > > None of the pieces "go through" any other pieces. However, "proof"
> > > does border on "unifying logic" as it wraps around to "rule", which
> > > (I am guessing) might mean that unifying logic does have an influence
> > > in how rules and proofs "play together".  (My naive guess would be
> > > that rules are used in proofs, but I don't know that.)  A bigger
> > > concern is that "proof" doesn't even touch "ontology." That seems
> > > strange to me.  Also, "Query" doesn't touch "Rule."
> > >
> > > Absent any explanation of the diagram, though, I have no idea what
> > > any of this actually means.
> > >
> > > Kathy
> > >
> > > At 11:13 AM -0500 7/30/07, Pat Hayes wrote:
> > > >  >Content-Type: multipart/signed;
> > > protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature";
> > > >>      micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms050805050601010506060202"
> > > >>
> > > >>Graphically, this is _almost_ equivalent to what is the most
> up-to-date
> > > >>for now:
> > > >>
> > > >  >http://www.w3.org/2007/03/layerCake.png
> > > >
> > > >Hmm, I wonder why the 'Proof' Tetris piece has a
> > > >connection to Rule without going through Unifying
> > > >Logic. That seems like a very bad decision to me
> > > >:-)
> > > >
> > > >Pat
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >>which also have an SVG version:
> > > >>
> > > >>http://www.w3.org/2007/03/layerCake.svg
> > > >>
> > > >>and a smaller png dump
> > > >>
> > > >>http://www.w3.org/2007/03/layerCake-small.png
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>Ivan
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>Story Henry wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>   No this is the latest
> > > >>> http://www.w3.org/2007/Talks/0130-sb-W3CTechSemWeb/layerCake-4.png
> > > >>>
> > > >>>   The applications at the top are really important. It is they
> > > >>>that will help
> > > >>>   create tension for the convergence of vocabularies.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>   Henry
> > > >>>
> > > >>>   On 27 Jul 2007, at 23:03, Juan Sequeda wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>   Hi all
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>   I would like to know where I can find the current up-to-date
> > > Semantic
> > > >>>>   Web layer cake. It seems that [1] is the most used, but is that
> the
> > > >>>>   recent one?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>   Thanks!
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>   [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/09/06-ecdl/slide17-0.html
> > > >>>>
>
Received on Sunday, 28 February 2016 23:09:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:41:50 UTC