- From: Sergio José Rodríguez Méndez <srodriguez@pet.cs.nctu.edu.tw>
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 01:22:43 +0800
- To: public-xg-ssn@w3.org, semantic-web@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAFSabkz=a--n2iW57=xNvKtQJKxi16=HkHr+0mBeff3_RLfj3A@mail.gmail.com>
Hello. Currently, I'm working on an ontology definition aligned to Semantic Sensor Network Ontology (SSN) <http://purl.oclc.org/NET/ssnx/ssn>, which, in turn, is aligned to the Dolce Ultra-Lite upper ontology <https://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/wiki/SSN_Skeleton#Aligning_the_SSN_Ontology_and_the_core_SSO_design_pattern_with_DOLCE> . One can see <https://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/ssn/ssnx/ssn#Module_DUL> that in the SSN ontology spec, the DUL IRI namespace is: *http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DUL.owl <http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DUL.owl>* However, it seems that this "link is broken", due that the IRI doesn't point the the proper DUL.owl definition. I'm trying to see/generate a data model visualization of SSN via the tool WebVOWL (Web-based Visualization of Ontologies) <http://vowl.visualdataweb.org/webvowl.html>. For this, I'm following this IRI: http://vowl.visualdataweb.org/webvowl/#iri=http://purl.oclc.org/NET/ssnx/ssn However, it fails due that it cannot find/retrieve DUL's definition: { *Could not load imported ontology: <http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DUL.owl> <http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DUL.owl>>; Cause: Problem parsing http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DUL.owl <http://www.loa-cnr.it/ontologies/DUL.owl>* *Could not parse ontology.* } Questions: - Is there any standard way to handle this "broken link" when aligning to upper ontologies? - Should DUL.owl be fixed? - Should SSN address this situation "somehow"? - If I'm aligning to SSN, how I should address this situation? Thank you for your feedback. /$¡rm Best regards, Sergio José Rodríguez Méndez (羅士豪) Pervasive Embedded Technologies Laboratory (PET Lab) Computer Science Department National Chiao Tung University
Received on Wednesday, 17 August 2016 17:23:54 UTC