- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 23:00:09 -0500
- To: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>
- Cc: Alessandro Seganti <a.seganti@cognitum.eu>, Paul Tyson <phtyson@sbcglobal.net>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <27C2B729-5CE6-4A2F-9A75-52A38F7EC9EC@ihmc.us>
Hi Juan I confess that did know, but had forgotten, about your excellent work. I really ought to stop commenting on such emails :-) Pat On Apr 24, 2016, at 7:11 PM, Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com> wrote: > Pat, > > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 11:23 PM, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> wrote: > > On Apr 22, 2016, at 2:47 AM, Alessandro Seganti <a.seganti@cognitum.eu> wrote: > >> Thank you all for your answers! >> So if I understood correctly the answer is: there is no standard to deal with modeling of the structure of RDBs. I started doing this by using instances as it seems to me the simplest way. I am trying to make an ontology as much as possible compatible with R2RML but there is not much to use apart from logicalTable and a couple of relations. >> >> This said, do you think that is there a reason why none has thought of a standard for this kind of mapping? > > It is an issue that many people have felt should be tackled, and it seems obvious how to start, but the details become very hard and have defeated all attempts to standardize such a mapping. For example, nothing in RDF can behave in the way that null behaves in RDBs, and RDF is agressively open-world in its underlying semantic model. > > Are you aware > > On Directly Mapping Relational Databases to RDF and OWL. WWW2012 > http://web.ing.puc.cl/~marenas/publications/www12b.pdf > > We address the issues that you mention. > > > > I wish you well in your attempt to do this: if you feel you are succeeding, please publicize your efforts as they may be widely useful. > > Pat Hayes > >> Maybe because in most use cases people want to map only specific queries to RDF graphs instead of mapping the whole database structure to an RDF graph? >> >> Regards, >> Alessandro >> >> Alessandro Seganti Ph.D. >> >> Cognitum Sp. z o.o., Data Engineer >> >> mail: a.seganti@cognitum.eu, tel: +48 22 250 2541, fax: +48 22 250 28 98 >> >> web: http://www.cognitum.eu/, fb: facebook.com/cognitum.eu >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Paul Tyson <phtyson@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 17:25 +0200, Alessandro Seganti wrote: >> > Hi everyone, >> > I want to formalize in RDF the table structure of a relational >> > database. What I would like to do is to formalize the links that >> > exists between all the tables inside a given relational database. This >> > would result in a graph where the nodes are the tables and the links >> > are the columns that can be used to join these tables. >> > >> > >> > My question is: is there some standard/ontology to describe this? >> > >> > >> > To my understanding the R2RML ontology is to describe mappings between >> > RDB and RDF (no RDB structure is mentioned). I also found a document >> > about direct mapping but no ontology is defined in this document. >> > >> >> When the RDB2RDF WG was working I suggested including an RDB ontology. >> But it was considered out of scope so nothing of the sort was included >> in their final deliverables. >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2010Oct/0055.html >> >> My work didn't (and doesn't) involve RDBMS deeply enough to pursue this, >> so I don't know how valuable this would be for practical tasks. >> >> Regards, >> --Paul >> > >> > >> > >> > Thank you for your help. >> > Alessandro Seganti Ph.D. >> > >> > Cognitum Sp. z o.o., Data Engineer >> > >> > mail: a.seganti@cognitum.eu, tel: +48 22 250 2541, fax: +48 22 250 28 >> > 98 >> > >> > web: http://www.cognitum.eu/, fb: facebook.com/cognitum.eu >> > >> > >> >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > IHMC (850)434 8903 home > 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office > Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax > FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile (preferred) > phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC (850)434 8903 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile (preferred) phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Monday, 25 April 2016 04:01:24 UTC