- From: Silvio Peroni <silvio.peroni@unibo.it>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 22:48:17 +0100
- To: Nicolas Chauvat <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr>
- CC: Semantic Web Mailing List <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <C078361B-DF8F-47B9-9250-355D9204573E@unibo.it>
Hi Nicholas, > I have had a quick look at the documentation but did not find an > answer to the following question: > > How do you relate or position RASH with respect to BocBook ? I think you are referring to DocBook, right? :-) Generally speaking, DocBook is a quite impressive and large XML-based markup language for writing textual documents. It includes several tags in its specification that basically allow one to write a quite large set of different kinds of documents, from research articles to books. It is a stand-alone markup language and, thus, it is not immediately viewable and browsable through a Web browser, even if several tools have been developed in order to address such issue (e.g., there exist several XSLT files for managing this). In contrast, RASH has a narrower scope, since it has been developed for creating research papers only, and it is not a “pure” new markup language. Rather, it restricts the use of existing HTML5 elements in a way that “obliges” you to write simple markup rather than complex hierarchies of nested elements. Its intrinsic simplicity has been of great advantage for developing all the tools (https://github.com/essepuntato/rash/tree/master/tools) included in its Framework. In addition, since it’s HTML (+ Javascript), RASH documents are ready for being viewed and navigated through any browser without further pre-processing. Have a nice day :-) S. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Silvio Peroni, Ph.D. Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of Bologna, Bologna (Italy) Tel: +39 051 2094871 E-mail: silvio.peroni@unibo.it Web: http://www.essepuntato.it Twitter: essepuntato
Received on Thursday, 12 November 2015 21:54:30 UTC