- From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 00:10:38 +0100
- To: Wouter Beek <w.g.j.beek@vu.nl>
- Cc: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>, "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Wouter, could you elaborate on the agent calculus bit? Martynas graphityhq.com On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Wouter Beek <w.g.j.beek@vu.nl> wrote: > Hi Ruben, Kingsley, others, > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 9:49 PM, Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be> > wrote: >> >> Of course—but the emphasis in the community has mostly been on servers, > > The emphasis has been on servers and, as of late, on Web Services. >> >> whereas the SemWeb vision started from agents (clients) that would do >> things (using those servers). > > Today we are nowhere near this vision. In fact, we may be further removed > from it today than we were in 2001. If you look at the last ISWC there was > particularly little work on (Web) agents. > >> Now, the Semantic Web is mostly a server thing, which the Google/CSE >> example also shows. > > With the LOD Laundromat we had the experience that people really like it > when we make publishing and consuming data very easy for them. People > generally find it easier to publish their data through a Web Service rather > than having to use more capable data publishing software they have to > configure locally. We ended up with a highly centralized approach that > works for many use cases. It would have been much more difficult the build > the same thing in a distributed fashion. > > I find it difficult to see why centralization will not be the end game for > the SW as it has been for so many other aspects of computing (search, email, > social networking, even simple things like text chat). The WWW shows that > the 'soft benefits' of privacy, democratic potential, and data ownership are > not enough to make distributed solutions succeed. > > However, I believe that there are other benefits to decentralization that > have not been articulated yet and that are to be found within the semantic > realm. An agent calculus is fundamentally different from a traditional > model theory. > > --- > Best regards, > Wouter Beek. > > Email: w.g.j.beek@vu.nl > WWW: wouterbeek.com > Tel: +31647674624
Received on Wednesday, 11 November 2015 23:11:08 UTC